I've played two games of Blue vs Gray now, lost one and won one, both as the Union. Really enjoyed myself, as did Dave, my opponent. One of the things I greatly admire about this game is the man-management aspect. I spent a lot of my time thinking: Is X the right man for this job? Perhaps I should sack Y, but who would I replace him with? Could Z's talents be better used over there? I can't think of another wargame where you have to put this much thought into your organization and leadership. In most games I've played it's just a case of pile as many leaders as you can onto the stack for their modifiers. This design is a very clever piece of lateral thinking.